Sarah Cannon Cancer Institute at Medical City Healthcare Survivorship Needs Assessment: An Objective Look at the Diverse Needs of Cancer Survivors

November 2018 Vol 9, NO 11
Katie Narvarte, LMSW
Sarah Cannon Cancer Institute at Medical City Healthcare
Emily Gentry, RN, BSN, OCN
Sarah Cannon Cancer Institute at Medical City Healthcare
Jordan Henderson, RN, BSN, OCN
Sarah Cannon Cancer Institute at Medical City Healthcare
Cristina Laviada, RN, BSN
Sarah Cannon Cancer Institute at Medical City Healthcare
Mike Ashworth, PhD
Sarah Cannon Cancer Institute at Medical City Healthcare

Background: In 2005, the Institute of Medicine published “From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition.” The report highlights the long-term medical and psychosocial consequences of cancer treatment and provides a foundation for survivorship programs today.1

Dr Mullan, a physician and cancer survivor, identifies 3 distinct phases of survivorship: acute, extended, and permanent long-term survival.2 Mullan proposes “that survivorship be studied as a phenomenon in itself rather than a byproduct of afterthought of basic research on cancer treatment.”

In developing the survivorship program for Sarah Cannon Cancer Institute at Medical City Healthcare, the authors found a lack of evidence identifying needs of survivors (meaning from diagnosis into extended survivorship) and thus developed the survivorship needs assessment.

Objectives: Conducting an ongoing survivorship needs assessment supported 2 objectives: to map and identify the changing needs of survivors and to add to the database of knowledge; consequently, affecting survivorship programming to better meet patient needs.

Methods: The research team partnered with oncology navigators, healthcare providers, and nonprofit agencies to distribute the survivorship needs assessment.

An electronic link or paper version of an anonymous, HIPAA-compliant survey is offered to survivors. The survey contains 7 sections: Physical, Social, Emotional and Spiritual Health, Educational Resources, Demographic Information, and Survivorship Support. Survivors are asked to rate their current level of concern on a Likert scale from 1(no concern) to 5 (extreme concern) and provide qualitative information about survivorship support.

Results: Receiving 78 responses from the community, a majority (83%) of results represented white/Caucasian patients between the ages of 50 to 79 years. Analyzing the data provides insight into patient health subdivided by factors such as geography, age, phase of survivorship, and patient preference for information.

For example, reviewing the information by subsets identified as above similarities and differences are noted. Every geographic area except Collin County registered higher (3+ on Likert scale) financial concerns, whereas Collin County registered fear of recurrence as the highest concern. The majority of survivors in Tarrant and Collin counties—80% and 50%, respectively—disclosed they would not be interested in an online support group, while the majority in Denton and Dallas counties—75% and 55%, respectively—expressed a willingness to attend. A similarity observed throughout the metroplex included survivors’ willingness to travel about 25 minutes on average to attend a support group. All survivors indicated less frequent communication with the survivorship support team than anticipated. The young adult population noted higher physical concerns like sexual/intimacy issues/body changes versus older populations who listed fear of recurrence as a concern and requested financial resources for estate planning.

Conclusion: Assessing the needs of cancer survivors provides value and understanding to better serve this population with quality relevant care, programs, and resources. This knowledge contributes to the expanding field of psychosocial oncology.


  1. Institute of Medicine and National and National Research Council of the National Academies. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2005.
  2. Mullan F. Seasons of survival: reflections of a physician with cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:270-273.
Related Articles
Supporting the Value Proposition of Patient Navigation
Michelle Rowe, RN, Emily Gentry, RN, BSN, OCN
February 2019 Vol 10, No 2
Fighting Compassion Fatigue and Burnout by Building Emotional Resilience
Emily Gentry, RN, BSN, OCN
December 2018 Vol 9, No 12

The prevalence of compassion fatigue is a critical reality for oncology nurses and lay navigators. The factors that contribute to, or help stave off, compassion fatigue have been studied by leading academic minds and by healthcare administrators.

Factors Associated with Adherence to Risk Management for Women with a BRCA Mutation
Kathryn A. Pratt, BSN, RN, OCN, CBCN, Jillian Huang, MS, MPH, CGC
November 2018 Vol 9, NO 11
Last modified: December 19, 2018

Subscribe to the Journal of Oncology Navigation & Survivorship®

To sign up for our print publication or e-newsletter, please enter your contact information below.

  • First Name *
    Last Name *
  • Please enter your mailing address.

    Address Line 2
    Zip Code