In Patients with RRMM Teclistamab, a BCMA × CD3 Bispecific Antibody: Phase 1 Study Updates

2020 Year in Review - Multiple Myeloma —February 1, 2021

Categories:

Multiple Myeloma

Favorable efficacy and manageable safety are shown in the updated analysis of the phase 1 study of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This analysis supports the planned phase 2 monotherapy trial at 1500 µg/kg administered subcutaneously.

For patients who were intravenously administered teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) × CD3 bispecific antibody in RRMM, favorable phase 1 study results were previously presented. The primary objective was to identify the dose(s) to be used in the phase 2 investigation. Updated results and data for subcutaneous administration are now available.

Intravenous (0.3-720 µg/kg) and subcutaneous (80-3000 µg/kg) teclistamab was given to a total of 84 and 44 patients, respectively. Median age was 64 years, and the median number of prior lines of therapies was 6. Although 95% and 79% of patients were triple-class exposed/refractory, 70% and 38% of patients were penta-drug exposed/refractory, and 91% of patients were refractory to their last line of therapy.

Regarding pharmacokinetics, the half-life of teclistamab supports weekly intravenous dosing. After weekly intravenous or subcutaneous treatment, exposures increased in a dose-related manner. A subcutaneous dose of 1500 µg/kg had a comparable Cmax to an intravenous dose of 270 µg/kg. However, higher trough levels versus a 720-µg/kg intravenous dose occurred. Time to reach Cmax (Tmax) after subcutaneous dosing ranged from 3 to 8 days.

The most common hematologic adverse events (AEs) were anemia (55%), neutropenia (55%), thrombocytopenia (41%), and leukopenia (26%). The most common nonhematologic events were cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 53%), pyrexia (28%), diarrhea (24%), cough (23%), fatigue (23%), nausea (22%), back pain (20%), and headache (20%). In 39% of patients, grade ≥3 AEs occurred; neutropenia (23%) and anemia (9%) were the most common. In 55% and 50% of patients with intravenous and subcutaneous dosing, respectively, CRS (any grade) developed; events were observed within a median of 1 day later with subcutaneous administration. All CRS events were grade 1/2 and tended to occur with the initial dose(s). Neurotoxicity was experienced by 5% of patients among those who received intravenous administration (2% were grade ≥3), treatment-related infusion-related reactions were experienced by 5% of patients (all grade 1/2), and grade 5 AEs were reported in 4 patients but determined to be unrelated to treatment by the investigator, with the exception of 1 case of pneumonia. In 25% of patients who received the subcutaneous administration (all grade 1/2), injection-related reactions were experienced. In 15% of patients, infection-related AEs ≥grade 3 were observed; 3% were treatment-related.

Among the 120 patients with evaluable data across 4 intravenous and subcutaneous dose levels (intravenous: 270 µg/kg and 720 µg/kg weekly; subcutaneous: 720 µg/kg and 1500 µg/kg weekly), the overall response rate was 63.8% (30 of 47 patients specifically included in the response analysis, including N = 24 with ≥very good partial response [VGPR] and N = 9 with ≥complete response [CR]). Response data for patients who received a 3000-µg/kg subcutaneous dose are not yet available. However, the 1500-µg/kg subcutaneous dose was selected for phase 2 investigation. Six of 6 patients on this dose continue to be in response (3 partial response, 1 VGPR, 2 stringent CRs); responses deepened over time. Among 48 patients with responses in both cohorts, median time to first response was 1 month, whereas 38 responding patients remain on therapy for 1.6 to ≥21.3 months (thus, median duration of response has not yet been reached). Among patients in CR evaluable for minimal residual disease (MRD), 4 of 5 patients in the intravenous cohorts and 2 of 2 patients in the subcutaneous cohorts were MRD-negative at 10-6.

In patients with RRMM, favorable efficacy and safety results from this updated analysis of a phase 1 study support the planned phase 2 monotherapy trial of teclistamab 1500 µg/kg administered subcutaneously.

Reference
Abstract 180. ASH 2020. December 5, 2020. Updated phase 1 results of teclistamab, a b-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody, in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

 

Related Articles
Multiple Myeloma Year in Review Introduction
2022 Year in Review - Multiple Myeloma
This edition of Year in Review is focused on multiple myeloma (MM), a disease for which the treatment landscape has seen tremendous growth resulting in major favorable changes in patient outcomes. New treatments have been approved and novel classes of agents continue to be investigated, particularly in the relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) setting. We are providing this Year in Review series to disseminate the latest information on treatment advances in 2022 to clinicians in a timely and effective manner.
Addition of ASCT to Triplet Induction and Lenalidomide Maintenance to Progression: Results from the DETERMINATION Trial
2022 Year in Review - Multiple Myeloma
The addition of ASCT to triplet induction with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) and lenalidomide maintenance resulted in significant PFS benefit versus RVd alone.
Daratumumab + Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone Induction Followed by Daratumumab Maintenance Achieved Durable Responses in Patients with RRMM and NDMM
2022 Year in Review - Multiple Myeloma
Final results from LYRA demonstrated robust responses with dara + CyBorD induction, which deepened with dara maintenance.
Last modified: August 10, 2023

Subscribe Today!

To sign up for our print publication or e-newsletter, please enter your contact information below.

I'd like to receive:

  • First Name *
    Last Name *
     
     
    Profession or Role
    Primary Specialty or Disease State
    Country